Channel / container
battleboarding
Matchups, feats, abilities, and evidence-based versus debates.
Open public result →PABC PUBLIC ARCHIVE
Search discussions, profiles, and community knowledge.
Search public material by character, thread title, philosophical concept, cosmology, Wiki subject, reply text, or channel. This search is read-only and does not include direct messages, drafts, or private account data.
10 results for battleboarding
Discussion
The Overvoid is Not a Piece of Paper (Or: Why "MW-Pe" is a Reading Comprehension Failure)
**To:** CaveGuy, Logiaa, and the PABC Review Board **From:** KerinjSekali **Subject:** Formal Appeal against the "MW-Pe" Classification of the Overvoid Alright, let's talk about this ruling. I respect the hustle, CaveGuy. Building a system that actually demands evidence is a good thing. But your recent ruling on the Presence and the Overvoid is a masterclass
Open public result →Discussion
Tier 0 Problem, and Mw-Pe
# a debate happened and it happened on discord, on the presence but caveguy later admitted he didnt understood the lore of DCU and never read morrison, so he did this from what he could abduct. Caveguy told Kerinj to start updating the Presence profile. His point was that being the blank white page does not automatically establish dialetheia or an absolute b
Open public result →Discussion
Official Debating Guide
**Practical debate procedure · Evidence → warrant → inference → conclusion** Welcome to PABC. The goal is not to win by volume, tier labels, scan dumps, or philosophical name-dropping. The goal is to make claims precise enough that another member can inspect the source, test the inference, and identify exactly where disagreement lies. ## 1. Choose the right
Open public result →Reply
Reply in: The Overvoid is Not a Piece of Paper (Or: Why "MW-Pe" is a Reading Comprehension Failure)
bro won, we get it. 😭 as far as i can give you, overvoid can be Tier 0-B at best. because we also implement dialetheia in tier 0-B (Ineffable, the one, etc). dialetheia requires the whole lore to be fully dialetheic supportive. where there was a time where being and nonbeing not just reconcile but just is.
Open public result →Discussion
Community Rules and Moderation Policy
PABC NEXUS COMMUNITY RULES 1. NO NSFW. Explicit sexual content, pornography, sexualized nudity, sexual solicitation, and sexual content involving minors are prohibited. Do not post graphic sexual content or use profiles, avatars, or links to evade this rule. 2. No harassment, targeted insults, threats, hate, dogpiling, or encouragement of self-harm or violen
Open public result →Discussion
EPL, Duality, Plot-Induced Stupidity
# The Uniqueness of PABC PABC is not interested in becoming another tiering community that takes increasingly impressive cosmological descriptions, assigns increasingly impressive numbers to them, and calls the result metaphysics. We are not here to compete over who can stack the most dimensions, worlds, timelines, planes of existence, conceptual realms, nar
Open public result →Discussion
@thecave_guy: System H Proposal
so here’s what I’m gonna say. I think System G and System Z should be merged into **System H**, with the proposed **Tier 1-F** added as a new category. Not because we need another shiny tier to argue about until the heat death of the forum, but because the current setup can be made easier to use without throwing away the useful parts. System Z is good at han
Open public result →Discussion
PABC Nexus Community Rules and Conduct Standards
## Official Community Standards, Debate Requirements, Moderation Procedure, and Rule of Thumb **Status:** Proposed comprehensive community policy **Applies to:** PABC Nexus, its forum, wiki, public channels, profile pages, debate threads, scaling discussions, shared reference material, and official community spaces **Purpose:** To protect members, preserve e
Open public result →Discussion
PABC Official CRT on Set Theory
## Abstract This thesis proposes a formal policy for interpreting set-theoretic and ordinal language in fictional cosmology debates within PABC. Its central distinction is between mathematical set theory as a formal discipline and fictional-based set interpretation, abbreviated FBSI, a PABC convention for mapping claims made by a fictional work onto set-theo
Open public result →